Exploitation is not productivity

Exploitation is not productivity...

What a great sentence.

But How do i produce without exploiting the existing resources?
Produce needs ingredients...can't produce something from the
air...ah...that is also a wrong sentence or comment to make...
am i not exploiting air?

Why do geeks like me like that statement?

I believe the sentence is read as "over exploitation" or
"unwanted exploitation" OR "only exploit".

Is outsourcing is a exploitation?
Yes it is. But does it reduce the productivity? would
say NO. It increases productivity of the outsourcing company. Does not it
exploit the brains of the third world country?


Then why this sentence is so popular? It is a philosophical
statement and not a sentence. How do we produce without
exploiting resources....to produce you need resource/ingredients. Once you
produce the ingredients vanishes....exploited.

There are ways to produce without utilization...like
internet search (google)...but it utilizes or exploits the work done
by millions of people over few decades. To an argument google
can be considered as 'no exploitation product' company. Because
it exploits something available for free and the produce does not
deplete the ingredients. But may not be entirely true.

I may be comfortable with the following statement than the
one quoted above.

"minimize exploitation and maximize Productivity".


How do I minimize exploitation? Well, that is a different
topic all together. I will see whether i can put something
on that topic.

Cheers.